Then let me introduce Claudia. Your right hand in sales.
She delivers fresh leads and fills your pipeline automatically.
While you focus on what you do best and love most: having conversations and closing deals.
Claudia goes into your market, scans hundreds or thousands of companies and pulls out the ones where something is moving right now. A CEO change, a funding round, a job posting, a press release.
Your addresses from the CRM, from Excel lists, from the last trade show. Whether 500 or 5,000. Claudia goes through them and pulls out the ones where something is moving now.
Claudia continuously monitors your existing leads and customers. When a contact signal appears there, she tells you. Perfect for cross-selling and upselling, before the competition notices.
All three ways end the same: you get the ready-to-use lead with contact signal and opening message.
She finds the right moment and the right reason to start a conversation. Nothing more, but nothing less either.
Her strength is not searching, but knowing what to look for.
She is your right hand. The conversation is yours to run.
The difference makes all the difference. Addresses with a named contact — everyone has those. What is missing is the reason. The reason why a call makes sense right now.
You have the data. We look for the signals. And tell you when.
Not purchase intent, but natural reasons. Not "this company wants to buy now", but "here is why a call makes sense now".
These are the signals many tools find. Claudia also finds the ones nobody sees. Because she knows what to look for.
Several roles change in quick succession. A new CEO brings their own CFO. The board chair steps down. A new advisory board is formed. One change is coincidence. Three changes in six months is a restructure. And where there is restructure, there is need.
A tool sees three role changes. Claudia sees a reshuffle. And knows that now is the moment to talk to the owner.
From several hundred candidate companies, Claudia filters, using a multi-stage sourcing pipeline, a handful of matches. Every company fits your sweet spot, every one has a current trigger, every one has a named contact with role and rationale.
Die meisten Kandidaten fliegen vorher raus. Falsche Grösse, falsche Branche, kein Signal, keine erreichbare Person. Genau das nimmt Claudia dir ab.
So you can see what this looks like concretely, here are two examples from different industries. In each case, the address as you would pull it from a database today. And next to it, the same address, sharpened by Claudia.
This format is the standard. Every address you get from Claudia has this level of rationale, signal and hook-in point.
Every lead Claudia delivers contains:
No mass list. Hidden pearls. Instead of 1,000 calls, just 25 — because these 25 really fit.
The most common worry about delivered addresses: "And now I'm supposed to call cold?" You don't have to. Even the best address remains a first contact, we know that. That's why every address arrives as a ready-to-go outreach situation.
Fully drafted, with the individual hook from the contact signal. You read it, adjust one sentence at most, send.
Two, three days later. The recipient has seen your email, the call has a reason. This is no longer a cold call, this is a follow-up.
Opening line, reason, two qualification questions, next step. Cut to this company's pain, not generic.
The call, you make yourself. But you never start from zero.
What Claudia delivers is not a static list, but a continuous stream. As soon as a relevant signal appears somewhere — a new job posting, a CEO change, a funding round, a press release — it's captured and assigned to the matching company.
You get the addresses sorted by intent. Not alphabetically, not randomly, but by urgency. Who's hot today, who in two weeks, who to keep an eye on. This saves you the step that otherwise eats hours every day: prioritising.
Manually, it's barely feasible. Who could comb through thousands of press releases, LinkedIn posts, job listings and news feeds every day, to fish out precisely the two or three signals that match your offering? Nobody. That's the work Claudia does in the background.
And she gets continuously better at it. With every sharpening session, Claudia learns not only which companies fit, but also where the next signals are likely to appear. Which sources are worth it, which terms yield relevant hits, which industry specifics matter. Over time, the search doesn't broaden, it focuses.
Claudia takes on a specialised task for you. She researches every signal that's publicly findable and processes it cleanly. Scanning press releases, cross-checking LinkedIn profiles, skimming annual reports, identifying named contacts, classifying contact signals.
This work could in principle be done by anyone. But if you're not specialised in it, you need 60 to 90 minutes per lead. At 25 leads a month, that's 25 to 40 hours of pure research — a full working week of a sales rep who should actually be selling. And the result remains uneven anyway.
On top of that: this work can't be done today without machine support anyway. Who can tell by eye alone what's a signal on the internet and what isn't? Who can comb through thousands of press releases, LinkedIn posts and job listings every day? The question is no longer whether you use a machine. The question is only: which one.
Do you go at it unstructured, wild and messy with some tool? Or do you train Claudia as your sales agent, who does exactly this prep work for you and saves you around 25 to 40 hours of research per month for 25 leads?
Claudia handles pre-qualification and perfect matching before a lead reaches you. That's the first savings lever.
The second lever is even bigger. From hundreds of ICP-matching companies, the pipeline filters down to the 25 that are really approachable now, because they have a current signal. Instead of 1,000 cold calls for 8 meetings, 25 targeted contacts are enough for the same 8 meetings. Sales no longer talks to lists, but to people where it fits.
What arrives at your end isn't a research task, but a reason for a conversation. You or your sales team dive into what sales actually is: talking to the right customers.
The data Claudia gathers is public. Company websites, LinkedIn profiles, press releases, annual reports, industry magazines, official registries. What's findable online by anyone, we collect, sort, summarise.
We do this on behalf of the client. Claudia is the administrative prep work that someone could also do themselves, if they had the time. We are the hands that do this research work and deliver the summarised result at the end.
What we don't do: We don't hack websites. We don't buy grey-market address lists from dubious brokers. We don't bypass login pages or paywalls. We don't invent data.
If information isn't publicly findable, for example the personal email address of a head of procurement, Claudia looks for the best possible alternative. Usually a functional address or the direct LinkedIn channel, with a note in the lead briefing.
What ends up in the lead is what you would have found yourself, only in a fraction of the time and cleanly documented.
Formally this runs as data processing on your behalf: you are the controller, we work on your instruction, governed by a data-processing agreement you receive with the offer. And yes, we also use publicly viewable LinkedIn profiles as one of several sources, researched manually, without automation on your account, without mass outreach.
Claudia currently works for a handful of clients in the DACH region. A consulting firm in Zurich that previously used purchased lists is now reaching out more precisely from the first pipeline work and reports that the responses are different because the hooks are different. A Swiss industrial-goods manufacturer sharpened and prioritised his existing distribution list. A behavioural economist extracted, from a list of around 1,600 Swiss companies, the top matches worth having conversations with.
The method isn't old, the lever is visible.
Instead of telling you more stories here, I'd rather propose a demo case. You bring an industry, a region, a hypothesis. I'll build a small showcase for you on your real market, with concrete addresses, contact signal and named contact. We'll also show very concretely what the solution costs and what it saves you. No abstract projections, but numbers on your real case.
Afterwards, you decide whether it's a fit for you.
A qualified lead doesn't emerge on its own. It costs research time, or it costs money. Enter your numbers and you'll see what a lead really costs you when you research yourself, and what it costs when Claudia does it.
The real lever isn't the price per lead, it's the ability to follow through: the 25 leads from Claudia have a contact signal, named contact and opening message. One follow-through-ready lead is worth more than three raw ones.
Meeting parity as a working hypothesis: From our first pipelines we see that 25 contact-signal leads from Claudia on average lead to the same number of meetings as a thousand classic cold calls. This is not a factual claim, but a testable hypothesis. The most honest way to check it is on your own market in the demo case.
Three layers. Three truths. You decide where to invest your money, time and nerves.
On the left, what you rent today from an address broker. On the right, what Claudia delivers. Both have addresses with a named contact. What Claudia does differently, you'll see in a moment.
If you really want more, talk to our sales team. Claudia digs up the gold, and behind her stands an entire team for everything that comes after.
When we say Claudia is a sales agent, we mean it literally. So you know who you're talking to, here's the honest breakdown.
If you're looking for a login screen, we're not the right choice. If you want a colleague who understands your market, we are.
Clay, Apollo and every AI-SDR deliver output. What none of them delivers: 60 minutes per month in which your market knowledge flows into the system. And on exit, everything built belongs to you. The signal hypotheses, the role filters, the industry priorities. You're not renting a black box, you're building a judgement that stays.
Four questions we get asked repeatedly. Because they go deep, here are the honest answers.
Both, depending on what you do with it. Claudia delivers signals that either become an immediate reason or move to a watchlist until the reason arrives. What Claudia becomes, Claudia doesn't decide. You decide with your view of the company and your strategy.
No. A contact signal decides timing, never the principle. It says: this is worth a look. Whether and how you make contact, you decide. Not Claudia.
Internal moods, she cannot read. That's not public, that's your territory. What she does see are patterns in the public: a single reshuffle says little. Three changes in quick succession, plus a Kununu downturn and second-level departures — that's public evidence that the company is not stabilising.
Because the person you work with emerges from a company situation. Not the other way around. The company situation is dateable, the people within it are a consequence. Claudia dates the situation. You read the person.
Three ways are then possible.
Wenn Claudia trifft, läuft sie weiter. Ab Monat 10 monatlich kündbar, ohne Mindestlaufzeit.
Wenn etwas grundsätzlich anders justiert werden soll, schärfen wir Claudia neu. Andere Region, andere Rolle, anderes Signal.
If it doesn't fit, clean cut without follow-on costs. No lock-in, no hidden clauses, no drama.
Claudia delivers monthly. One sharpening session every month. After nine months, an open check-point. Renew, resharpen, or exit cleanly.
60 minutes per month, video or phone. We go through the leads Claudia has delivered together:
Concrete adjustments come out of every session. This isn't a status meeting with slides. This is iteration on Claudia.
Claudia can be adapted more precisely to your wishes with every session. Month 1 is calibration. Month 6 already lands noticeably. Month 9, she is your sales agent.
It's like an employee you train on your products. First she learns your market, then your language, then your customers. After nine months she knows what she's doing.
Ich bin Alfred Rossi, der Vulkantänzer. Schweizer, lebe und arbeite in Lanzarote, und ich betreibe ProSeller AG, die Nummer 1 im B2B-Vertrieb für die Schweizer ICT-Branche. In den letzten Jahren habe ich für Schweizer Hersteller, Distributoren und Reseller dutzende Vertriebsaktivitäten aufgebaut, durchgezogen und gemeinsam mit den Kunden nachgeschärft.
What works, what doesn't, which contact signals really carry, which roles are approachable, when a call is worth it and when an email is enough: this knowledge is now baked into Claudia as best practice.
My standard: what arrives at your end isn't an "AI tool" but a system that grew out of real sales work, with a human next to it who works with you on your market. If you want software, there are 100 other providers. If you want someone who takes the administrative prep work off your plate and honestly discusses with you what hit and what missed, then I'm your person.
Zwei Wege wären denkbar.
Erstens: selber recherchieren. Ja, kannst du. Eine sauber recherchierte Adresse mit Signal, Decision Maker und Aufhänger braucht 60 bis 90 Minuten. Bei 20 Adressen pro Monat sind das schnell 20 bis 30 Stunden. Plus die Tools, die du dafür brauchst: Hunter.io, Sales Navigator, Datenanreicherung. Das summiert sich.
The real issue is discipline. In the first month you do it thoroughly. In the second, less. In the third, not at all, because a client meeting came up, then another. The same happens in your sales team, only you don't see it directly. And your 800 old contacts, 1,500 business cards, 3,000 addresses in the CRM? Who goes through them? Nobody.
Second: building it yourself. On LinkedIn you read "I replaced my SDR with 7 Claude agents, here's the free guide." Sounds tempting. The technology can actually do it. But realistically, it's 40 to 80 hours of setup, not 15 minutes. Plus 200 to 500 dollars per month in API costs. Plus ongoing maintenance when websites or LinkedIn structures change. Plus the question of who puts the knowledge about real sales buying signals into the prompts.
In the end, you're no longer a seller, you're the developer of a sales stack. And if something breaks, the damage is yours.
My point: Both work. But both end up costing you more time, money and attention than Claudia. And both are missing the real lever: someone who sharpens the system with you to your market.
Die meisten AI-Sales-Tools sind Software-Produkte: Datenbanken, Outreach-Systeme, Automationen, generische Lead-Scorings. Standardlogik für alle.
Claudia works differently. She's sharpened over months on your market, your language, your customers and your contact signals. With every session, she learns more precisely which companies fit and which don't. Claudia is less a tool, more a trained sales agent for your team.
The decisive question isn't "which tool has more features", but "which solution understands my market more precisely over time and thereby delivers more relevant addresses and conversations".
Vier Familien dominieren den Markt 2026: Daten-Plattformen (Clay, Apollo), autonome AI-SDRs (11x, Artisan), Sequencer (Outreach, Lemlist) und DIY-Claude-Stacks auf LinkedIn. Alle technisch beeindruckend, alle mit ungelösten Problemen:
Claudia isn't another tool. Claudia is a method with a human next to her. You're not building software, you're building an agent for your specific market. With Apollo, Clay or a DIY stack, you're on your own. With Claudia, you have a human who takes responsibility for delivery quality and corrects errors with you.
Then you leave. There's no 9-month gag clause. The method is designed for 9 months because sharpening takes time. But if after three months it's clear it doesn't fit, we cleanly end it. No lock-in, no follow-on costs.
Your data stays with you. We process publicly accessible data on behalf of the client. Your CRM, your customer lists, your internal information are not part of what Claudia touches, unless you explicitly bring them in (for example as your own lead list for enrichment). Even then, nothing leaves our pipeline.
You keep what we've built together. The contact-signal hypotheses, the role filters, the industry priorities are yours. If you want to continue the system with another provider or build it internally, that's possible without obstacles on our side.
Yes, even better. The more niche the market, the more precise Claudia can become, because the sharpening concentrates on a clearly defined domain. Generic standard tools are weakest in niches. Claudia is strongest there.
One sharpening session per month, 60 minutes. Plus processing the leads, which you'd do anyway. Nothing more. You're not building a second employee you have to manage.
We mark confidence per data field in the lead briefing. If an email address comes from a functional source rather than directly, it says so. If a contact signal is a hypothesis rather than a hard confirmation, it says so. You always know what you're relying on.
Wenn du eine Offerte hast und sie passt: antworte mir einfach mit OK und ich starte die Setup-Phase mit Claudia.
Wenn du diskutieren willst oder noch keine Offerte hast: buch dir einen Slot oder schreib mir.